Wage and hour lawsuits have become one of the most expensive risks facing employers today, with settlements reaching unprecedented levels and enforcement agencies becoming increasingly aggressive. The landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years, particularly as remote work and changing employment practices have created new compliance challenges that many employers are unprepared to handle. Employees are suing employers like you to recover unpaid wages, and there is not typically insurance coverage for such claims.
Understanding what employers need to know about wage and hour lawsuits is no longer optional—it’s essential for business survival. With settlement costs ranging from thousands to millions of dollars, and the potential for liquidated damages that can double an employer’s liability, the stakes have never been higher. This comprehensive guide will equip you with the knowledge needed to protect your business, understand your obligations under federal law, and implement effective prevention strategies.
If an employee or employees have made an unpaid wage claim or files wage and hour lawsuits against your business, contact the attorneys at Davis Business Law to help you defend against them and to learn what employers need to know about wage and hour litigation.
Understanding Wage and Hour Litigation Risks
Photo by Vitaly Taranov on Unsplash
The financial exposure from wage and hour lawsuits has reached staggering proportions, with the largest settlements in 2021 exceeding $640 million. These figures represent just the tip of the iceberg, as thousands of smaller settlements and judgments occur annually without making headlines. For employers, understanding the full scope of these risks is crucial for making informed decisions about compliance investments and risk management strategies.
The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered workplace dynamics, creating new compliance challenges that many employers struggle to navigate. Remote work policies, flexible scheduling arrangements, and hybrid work models have blurred traditional boundaries between work time and personal time. These changes have created fertile ground for wage and hour violations, particularly around issues of unpaid overtime wages and off-the-clock work that may not be immediately visible to management.
Class action lawsuits under the fair labor standards act can include all employees, meaning that a single violation affecting multiple employees can rapidly escalate into a costly collective action. The opt-in nature of FLSA collective actions makes them particularly dangerous, as employees can join the lawsuit simply by filing a consent form, potentially multiplying damages exponentially.
Settlement costs vary dramatically based on company size, industry, and the nature of violations. Small businesses might face settlements ranging from $5,000 to $50,000, while larger corporations can see exposure in the six or seven figures. Beyond the direct settlement costs, employers must also consider attorney’s fees, court costs, and the operational disruption caused by lengthy process of wage and hour lawsuits.
The consequences extend far beyond monetary damages. Wage and hour lawsuits can result in back wages spanning multiple years, liquidated damages that effectively double the employer’s liability, attorney’s fees for the prevailing employees, and additional penalties imposed by the Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division. These cumulative costs can threaten the viability of smaller businesses and significantly impact the profitability of larger organizations.
Most Common Wage and Hour Violations Leading to Wage and Hour Lawsuits
Overtime violations account for approximately 40% of all wage and hour settlements, making them the single largest source of litigation risk for employers. These violations often stem from misunderstandings about who qualifies for overtime pay and when overtime compensation is required. The complexity of overtime calculations, particularly when bonuses, commissions, and other forms of variable compensation are involved, creates additional opportunities for costly mistakes.
Misclassifying employees as exempt from overtime requirements when they should be classified as non exempt employees represents another major source of litigation. Many employers mistakenly believe that paying a salary automatically makes an employee exempt from overtime, when in reality, exempt employees must meet strict criteria related to their job duties, decision-making authority, and salary level. This misunderstanding has led to numerous successful challenges where generally salaried workers were found to be improperly denied overtime compensation.
The misclassification of workers as independent contractors rather than employees has become increasingly problematic as the gig economy has expanded. Employers who incorrectly classify workers as independent contractors to avoid paying overtime and other employment law obligations face significant liability when these workers are reclassified as employees entitled to wage and hour protections. The consequences of such misclassification can include years of back pay, benefits, and tax obligations.
Failing to pay employees for all hours worked can expose employers to substantial liability. This includes compensation for off-the-clock work, such as pre-shift setup time, post-shift cleanup, mandatory training sessions, and work performed during meal breaks. Many employers are surprised to learn that even brief periods of work, such as checking emails or taking work calls during breaks, can trigger overtime pay requirements if they cause an employee to exceed 40 hours in a workweek.
The treatment of short breaks and rest periods frequently leads to wage and hour lawsuits. Under federal laws, breaks lasting 20 minutes or less must be paid, and requiring employees to clock out for such brief periods violates FLSA requirements. Similarly, requiring employees to work through meal breaks without proper compensation, or creating policies that discourage employees from taking legally required breaks, can result in significant liability.
Training time, travel time, and time spent in mandatory meetings or company events often goes uncompensated, creating additional exposure for employers. When these activities occur during normal work hours or cause employees to exceed 40 hours in a workweek, they must be included in overtime calculations. The failure to recognize and compensate for such time represents a common oversight that can accumulate substantial liability over time.
FLSA Compliance Requirements Every Employer Must Know
The federal minimum wage remains at $7.25 per hour for covered nonexempt employees, a rate that has been unchanged since 2009. However, many states and localities have enacted higher minimum wage rates, and employers must pay the highest applicable rate to their workers. Understanding which employees are covered by federal laws versus state wage and hour laws is essential for proper compliance, as some employees may be exempt from federal coverage but still entitled to state protections.
Overtime pay at one and one-half times the regular rate must be provided for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek for non-exempt employees. This requirement applies regardless of whether the employee is paid hourly or receives a salary, and regardless of whether the overtime work was authorized in advance. The regular rate calculation can be complex when employees receive bonuses, commissions, or other forms of variable compensation, as these amounts must be included in the overtime rate calculation.
Employers must maintain accurate records of hours worked, wages paid, and employee classifications for all covered workers. These recordkeeping requirements extend beyond simple time cards to include detailed documentation of job duties, salary levels, and the basis for exempt classifications. The Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division actively investigates potential violations and can initiate enforcement actions based on employee complaints or targeted industry sweeps.
State and local minimum wage laws frequently require higher rates than federal standards, creating a complex compliance landscape for employers operating in multiple jurisdictions. Some states have enacted automatic minimum wage increases tied to inflation, while others have implemented different rates for different types of workers or business sizes. Staying current with these varying requirements is essential for avoiding wage and hour violations.
Employee Classification Under FLSA
Photo by Becca Tapert on Unsplash
Non exempt employees must receive overtime pay regardless of whether they are paid on an hourly or salary basis. The key distinction is not the method of payment but whether the employee meets the specific criteria for an exemption. This fundamental principle is often misunderstood by employers who assume that paying a salary automatically confers exempt status.
Exempt employees must satisfy distinct tests: the salary basis test, requiring payment of at least $684 per week, and the duties test, which requires that the employee’s primary duties involve executive, administrative, or professional functions. Both tests must be met for an exemption to apply, and failure to satisfy any single test renders the employee non-exempt and entitled to overtime compensation.
The executive, administrative, and professional exemptions each have specific requirements for job duties and decision-making authority that go far beyond job titles or general descriptions. Executive exempt employees must regularly supervise two or more full-time employees and have authority to hire, fire, or make recommendations regarding other employees’ employment status. Administrative exempt employees must perform office work directly related to management policies or business operations and exercise discretion and independent judgment on significant matters.
Professional exempt employees must perform work requiring advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning, typically acquired through prolonged intellectual instruction. Computer employees have their own specific exemption requirements related to systems analysis, programming, or software engineering functions. Outside sales employees are exempt if their primary duty is making sales or obtaining orders away from the employer’s place of business.
The critical point that many employers miss is that paying a salary alone does not make an employee exempt from overtime requirements. Each exemption requires careful analysis of actual job duties, not just job descriptions or titles. Misclassification can result in liability for up to three years of back wages, liquidated damages equal to the unpaid amounts, and attorney’s fees for the successful employees.
Statute of Limitations and Filing Deadlines
FLSA claims must generally be filed within two years from the date the wage violation occurred, but this period extends to three years when the violation is determined to be willful. The distinction between willful and non-willful violations can significantly impact an employer’s potential exposure, as willful violations not only extend the statute of limitations but also make liquidated damages more likely to be awarded.
Willful violations occur when an employer either knew its conduct violated the FLSA or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct was prohibited. Courts have found violations to be willful in cases where employers continued practices after being informed of potential FLSA issues, ignored legal advice regarding compliance, or maintained policies that clearly contradicted FLSA requirements.
State wage and hour claims may have different filing deadlines that can range from one year to six years depending on the jurisdiction. Some states also provide additional remedies beyond those available under federal law, including penalties, interest on unpaid wages, and extended statutes of limitations. Employees can often pursue both federal and state claims simultaneously, potentially increasing the employer’s total exposure.
Employees have multiple avenues for pursuing wage claims, including filing complaints with the Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division or bringing lawsuits directly in federal court. Administrative complaints can trigger investigations that may expand beyond the original complainant to examine the employer’s practices regarding all similarly situated employees.
Class action lawsuits and FLSA collective actions have specific procedural requirements that create critical deadlines for employers. The first 90 days after a collective action is filed are particularly important, as early response strategies can significantly impact the scope of discovery, the number of employees who join the lawsuit, and the ultimate resolution of the case. Employers who fail to respond strategically during this initial period often find themselves at a significant disadvantage as litigation progresses.
Effective Defense Strategies Against Wage and Hour Claims
Photo by Jakub Żerdzicki on Unsplash
Challenging the accuracy of claimed overtime hours requires comprehensive documentation and may involve detailed analysis of time records, security footage, computer logs, and other evidence of actual work performed. Employers who maintain detailed records of employee activities and can demonstrate discrepancies between claimed and actual hours worked are in a much stronger position to defend against inflated damage claims.
Demonstrating good faith compliance with Department of Labor regulations and interpretations can help employers avoid liquidated damages even when technical violations are found. Good faith requires more than just ignorance of the law; employers must show they made reasonable efforts to comply with FLSA requirements and relied on reasonable interpretations of applicable regulations or legal guidance.
Proving proper employee classification based on actual job duties and decision-making responsibilities requires detailed documentation of what employees actually do, not just what their job descriptions state. Employers should maintain records of specific decisions made by exempt employees, documentation of their authority levels, and evidence of the independent judgment they exercise in their roles.
Showing that overtime work was not authorized, known, or should have been known by management can be an effective defense, but requires consistent enforcement of clear policies. Employers must demonstrate that they had policies prohibiting unauthorized overtime, that these policies were clearly communicated to employees, and that violations were consistently disciplined. However, this defense does not eliminate the obligation to pay for overtime work that was actually performed, even if unauthorized.
Documenting consistent enforcement of timekeeping and overtime approval policies helps establish that any violations were aberrations rather than systematic practices. This includes maintaining records of disciplinary actions taken for policy violations, training provided to supervisors and employees, and regular audits of compliance with established procedures.
Maintaining detailed payroll records, job descriptions, and policy manuals as evidence supports multiple defense strategies and demonstrates the employer’s commitment to compliance. These records should be current, accurate, and regularly reviewed to ensure they reflect actual practices rather than outdated procedures.
Proactive Prevention Best Practices
Conducting annual wage and hour audits helps identify potential compliance issues before they become the subject of litigation. These audits should examine employee classifications, overtime calculations, timekeeping practices, and compliance with applicable proper minimum wage requirements. Regular audits also demonstrate good faith efforts to comply with wage and hour laws, which can be valuable in defending against claims of willful violations.
Implementing clear written policies requiring pre-approval for all overtime work helps control labor costs while establishing important defenses against unauthorized overtime claims. These policies must be consistently enforced and clearly communicated to all employees and supervisors. However, employers must remember that they remain obligated to pay for overtime work that is performed, even if it violates company policy.
Training supervisors and managers on FLSA requirements and proper timekeeping procedures is essential for preventing violations before they occur. This training should cover identification of compensable work time, proper classification of employees, overtime calculation requirements, and the importance of accurate recordkeeping. Regular refresher training helps ensure that changing workplace practices don’t inadvertently create compliance issues.
Using reliable timekeeping systems that automatically calculate overtime and prevent manual alterations reduces the risk of calculation errors and provides better documentation for defense purposes. Modern timekeeping systems can also help identify patterns of potential violations, such as employees consistently working through meal breaks or clocking in before scheduled start times.
Regularly reviewing and updating job descriptions ensures they accurately reflect the duties actually performed by employees and support proper exempt classifications. Job descriptions should be specific about decision-making authority, supervisory responsibilities, and the level of independent judgment required. Generic or outdated job descriptions can undermine exemption claims and should be avoided.
Staying current with federal, state, and local wage and hour law changes through legal counsel or specialized employment law resources helps prevent violations resulting from regulatory changes. The wage and hour legal landscape is constantly evolving, with new regulations, court decisions, and enforcement priorities creating ongoing compliance challenges. Contact Davis Business Law today to learn what employers need to know about wage and hour litigation.
Documentation and Record-Keeping Requirements
Maintaining payroll records for at least three years is required under the FLSA and should include detailed information about hours worked, wages paid, deductions taken, and the basis for any exemptions claimed. These records must be available for inspection by Department of Labor investigators and should be organized in a manner that facilitates easy review and analysis.
Keeping time cards, schedules, and attendance records for at least two years provides important evidence of actual hours worked and can support defenses against inflated damage claims. Electronic records should be backed up and preserved in a format that prevents unauthorized alterations.
Documenting all overtime approvals, discipline for policy violations, and training provided to employees creates a comprehensive record of the employer’s compliance efforts and consistent policy enforcement. This documentation can be crucial in demonstrating good faith compliance and defending against claims of willful violations.
Preserving email communications and electronic records related to work schedules and pay practices may reveal important evidence about whether employees were working unauthorized overtime or whether supervisors were aware of potential violations. Electronic discovery requirements in litigation make it essential to have comprehensive data retention policies that preserve relevant communications.
Creating detailed job descriptions that accurately reflect the actual duties performed by employees supports proper classification decisions and provides important evidence in defending against misclassification claims. These descriptions should be updated regularly and should focus on actual job functions rather than aspirational or idealized responsibilities.
How to Respond When Facing Wage and Hour Litigation
Immediately contacting a business and employment attorney, like an attorney at Davis Business Law, within 24-48 hours of receiving a lawsuit or government investigation notice is crucial for preserving defense options and avoiding costly mistakes. The early stages of wage and hour litigation are particularly important, as strategic decisions made during this period can significantly impact the ultimate resolution of the case.
Preserving all relevant documents including payroll records, timekeeping data, employee communications, and policy materials is essential for mounting an effective defense. Document preservation should extend beyond obvious payroll records to include emails, text messages, security footage, and any other materials that might provide evidence about actual hours worked or management knowledge of potential violations.
Avoiding discussions about the case with current employees and refraining from making changes to pay practices during litigation helps prevent actions that could be characterized as retaliation or obstruction. Any communications with employees about ongoing litigation should be coordinated through legal counsel to ensure they don’t inadvertently harm the employer’s defense.
Assessing settlement options early in the process is important because defense costs in wage and hour litigation can quickly exceed potential settlement amounts. Early case evaluation should consider the strength of employee claims, potential exposure to back wages and liquidated damages, and the costs of defending the case through trial.
Considering whether payroll providers or insurance policies might provide coverage or indemnification can help offset litigation costs and should be evaluated as soon as possible after a claim is filed. Some employment practices liability insurance policies provide coverage for wage and hour claims, while certain payroll service agreements may include indemnification provisions.
Evaluating the strength of employee claims and potential exposure helps determine whether aggressive defense or early settlement discussions are more appropriate. This evaluation should consider the accuracy of time records, the validity of exemption classifications, and the employer’s ability to demonstrate good faith compliance efforts.
Working with Legal Counsel
Working with attorneys to develop comprehensive litigation and business protection strategies helps ensure that legal responses support broader business objectives and minimize operational disruption. This includes coordinating public relations responses, managing employee communications, and implementing corrective measures that demonstrate good faith efforts to remedy any identified issues.
Considering engaging legal counsel before a wage claim for preventive compliance reviews and policy updates is often more cost-effective than defending against wage and hour claims after they arise. Proactive legal guidance can help identify and correct potential issues before they result in costly litigation, while also creating documentation of good faith compliance efforts that can be valuable in defending against future claims.
The landscape of wage and hour litigation continues to evolve, with new challenges emerging from changing work arrangements, increased enforcement activity, and expanding state and local requirements. Employers who understand their obligations, implement strong compliance programs, and respond strategically to potential claims are best positioned to minimize their exposure and protect their businesses from the significant costs associated with wage and hour violations.
Understanding what employers need to know about wage and hour litigation is ultimately about taking proactive steps to protect workers rights while minimizing business risk. By focusing on accurate employee classification, proper timekeeping, and consistent policy enforcement, employers can significantly reduce their exposure to a wage claim while creating better working conditions for their employees. The investment in compliance and prevention is almost always less expensive than the cost of defending against wage and hour claims, making proactive management of these issues both a legal necessity and a sound business strategy.
Call our experienced team at Davis Business Law today if you are an employer needing help with a wage claim or otherwise need to learn what employers need to know about wage and hour litigation.
